文章摘要
2型糖尿病肌电图异常的影响因素及截断值研究
Study on the Influencing Factors and Cut-off Values of Abnormal Electromyography in Type 2 Diabetes
投稿时间:2025-07-21  修订日期:2025-07-21
DOI:
中文关键词: 2型糖尿病  肌电图  年龄  糖化血红蛋白  24小时尿蛋白  
英文关键词: Type 2 diabetes  Electromyography  Age  Glycated hemoglobin  24-hour urine protein
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
汪烨 江苏省中医院 210000
周媛媛* 江苏省中医院 210000
摘要点击次数: 40
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:分析2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者肌电图异常的相关影响因素及其最佳截断值(cut-off values)。方法:选取在我院初次接受肌电图检查的131例T2DM患者,以肌电图结果分为肌电图正常组(N-EMG组,64例)和异常组(EMG组,67例),比较两组的一般资料及临床常见指标,二元logistic回归分析探讨T2DM肌电图异常的危险因素,ROC曲线分析危险因素的诊断效能及cut-off值,另将患者以24小时尿蛋白(24 h-UPr)水平分为高尿蛋白组(H-UPr组)、低尿蛋白组(L-UPr组),比较两组的肌电图异常率及异常特点。结果:EMG组与N-EMG组年龄、糖尿病病程、舒张压、脉压差、FBG、HbA1c、FT3、FT4、FT3/FT4、D-二聚体、24h-UPr比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。二元logistic回归分析提示年龄、HbA1c、24h-UPr是T2DM合并肌电图异常的危险因素(P<0.05)。3项指标联合预测肌电图异常的AUC为0.846,灵敏度为77.42%,特异度77.56%,ROC的cut-off值为61.5岁、8.20%、71.00mg/24h;H-UPr组的肌电图异常率较L-UPr组显著增加(P<0.05),且以下肢胫、腓感觉神经损伤为主(P<0.05)。结论:较大的年龄及较高水平的HbA1c、24h-UPr是T2DM合并肌电图异常的独立危险因素,3项指标联合检测具有更大的诊断效能,尤其当患者年龄>61.5岁,HbA1c>8.20%、24h-UPr>71.00mg/24h时。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To analyze the related influencing factors of abnormal electromyography in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its optimal cut-off values. Method: A total of 131 patients with T2DM who examined electromyography for the first time in our hospital were selected and divided into the normal electromyography group (N-EMG group,n=64) and the abnormal group (EMG group,n=67) based on the electromyography results. The general data and common clinical indicators of the two groups were compared. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the risk factors of abnormal electromyography in T2DM. The ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy and cut-off values of the risk factors. In addition, the patients were divided into the high urine protein group (H-UPr group) and the low urine protein group (L-UPr group) based on the 24-hour urine protein (24h-UPr) level. Compare the abnormal rates and characteristics of electromyography in the two groups. Result: There were statistically significant differences in age, duration of diabetes, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure difference, FBG, HbA1c, FT3, FT4, FT3/FT4, D-dimer, and 24h-UPr between the EMG group and the N-EMG group (P<0.05). Binary logistic regression indicated that age, HbA1c, and 24h-UPr were risk factors for T2DM combined with abnormal electromyography(P<0.05). The AUC of the combined prediction of electromyogram abnormalities by the three indicators was 0.846, with a sensitivity of 77.42% and a specificity of 77.56%. The cut-off values of ROC were 61.5 years old, 8.20%, and 71.00mg/24h. The abnormal rate of electromyography in the H-UPr group was significantly higher than that in the L-UPr group(P<0.05), especially the injury of sensory nerves in the tibia and peroneal of the lower extremities(P<0.05). Conclusion: Older age and higher levels of HbA1c and 24h-UPr are independent risk factors for T2DM combined with abnormal electromyography. The combined detection of the three indicators has greater diagnostic efficacy, especially when the patient's age >61.5 years old, HbA1c >8.20%, 24h-UPr>71.00mg/24h.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭