文章摘要
姜彬,张拥波,刘奇,陈瑞玲,高冉,朱先进.大脑中动脉粥样硬化性中重度狭窄斑块内出血及临床相关性分析[J].神经损伤功能重建,2025,(6):326-329
大脑中动脉粥样硬化性中重度狭窄斑块内出血及临床相关性分析
Analysis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Clinical Correlation in Patients with Moderate toSevere Stenosis of the Middle Cerebral Artery Due to Atherosclerosis
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 大脑中动脉  斑块  高分辨磁共振管壁成像
英文关键词: middle cerebral artery  plaque  high resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging
基金项目:
作者单位
姜彬,张拥波,刘奇,陈瑞玲,高冉,朱先进 首都医科大学附属 北京友谊医院神经 内科 
摘要点击次数: 7
全文下载次数: 3
中文摘要:
      目的:使用高分辨磁共振血管壁成像(high resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging, HRMR-VWI)评价大脑中动脉(middle cerebral artery,MCA)粥样硬化性狭窄斑块内出血的比例及临床相关 性。方法:收集2019年7月~2023年8月我院收治的MCA-M1或M2段中重度狭窄(50%~99%)患者的临 床及影像学资料(T1平扫脂肪抑制序列HRMR-VWI图像,斑块内出血定义为T1高信号,信号强度>150%周 围肌肉组织信号);根据3个月内MCA中重度狭窄供血区内是否存在缺血症状,分为症状性狭窄组和无症 状性狭窄组;症状性狭窄组再根据DWI特点分为动脉-动脉栓塞亚组和非动脉-动脉栓塞亚组。比较各组和 各亚组的临床及影像学数据。结果:最终59例患者纳入分析,其中14例(23.7%)MCA狭窄病变中可见斑块 内出血。症状性狭窄组30例(50.8%),其中斑块内出血11例(36.7%),发生率高于无症状性狭窄患者[3例 (10.3%)],差异有统计学意义(P=0.018)。症状性狭窄患者中,11例(36.7%)患者可见动脉-动脉栓塞,其中7/ 11例(63.6%)可见斑块内出血,发生率高于非动脉-动脉栓塞患者(4/19例,21.1%),差异具有统计学差异(P= 0.047)。2组间及2亚组间其余因素差异未见明显统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:症状性MCA中重度狭窄 患者斑块内出血的比例高于无症状性狭窄患者,且在症状性狭窄患者中,栓塞性梗死的患者发现斑块内出 血的比例更高,对于评估MCA狭窄患者的梗死机制及卒中风险具有重要意义。
英文摘要:
      To evaluate the proportion of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and its clinical correlation in patients with atherosclerotic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) using high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HRMR-VWI). Methods: We collected clinical and imaging data from patients with moderate to severe stenosis (50%~99%) of the MCA-M1 or M2 segments treated in our hospital from July 2019 to August 2023. IPH was defined as T1 hyperintensity on fat-saturated HRMR-VWI images, with signal intensity>150% of the surrounding muscle tissue. Patients were divided into symptomatic stenosis and asymptomatic stenosis groups based on the presence of ischemic symptoms within the MCA territory within 3 months. The symptomatic stenosis group was further subdivided into artery-to-artery embolism and non-artery-to-artery embolism subgroups according to DWI characteristics. Clinical and imaging data were compared among groups and subgroups. Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 14(23.7% ) had IPH in the MCA stenosis lesions. The symptomatic stenosis group comprised 30 patients (50.8%), and the incidence of IPH in symptomatic stenosis patients was 11/30(36.7%), significantly higher than that in asymptomatic stenosis patients [3/29(10.3%)], with a statistically significant difference (P=0.018). Among symptomatic stenosis patients, 11(36.7% ) had artery-to-artery embolism, of whom 7/11(63.6% ) had IPH, a significantly higher incidence than in non-artery-to-artery embolism patients (4/19, 21.1% ), with a statistically significant difference (P=0.047). No significant differences were observed for other factors between the two groups and two subgroups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: The proportion of IPH is higher in symptomatic MCA moderate to severe stenosis patients compared to asymptomatic patients. Moreover, within the symptomatic group, patients with embolic infarction have a higher incidence of IPH. This finding is significant for evaluating the infarction mechanism and stroke risk in MCA stenosis patients.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭