文章摘要
绳带疗法联合mCIMT对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能、平衡能力及日常生活活动能力的影响
Effects of rope belt therapy combined with mCIMT on lower limb motor function, balance and activities of daily living in stroke patients
投稿时间:2024-12-23  修订日期:2024-12-23
DOI:
中文关键词: 脑卒中  绳带疗法  mCIMT  下肢运动功能  平衡能力  日常生活活动能力
英文关键词: Stroke  Rope belt therapy  mCIMT  Lower limb motor function  Balance  Activities of daily living
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
詹浩伟 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 116016
王世林 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
加王虎 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
李之彤 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
孙元鑫 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
刘敬平 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
侯雪 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 
温晓妮 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院 710068
摘要点击次数: 19
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:探究绳带疗法联合mCIMT对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能、平衡能力及日常生活活动能力的影响。 方法:选取在大连港医院康复医学科住院的45例脑卒中患者,将其随机分为对照组(n=15)、mCIMT组(n=15)、联合组(n=15)。对照组只进行常规康复训练;在常规康复训练的基础上,mCIMT组进行mCIMT训练,联合组同时进行绳带疗法及mCIMT训练。三组常规康复训练均60min/次,5次/周;mCIMT训练、mCIMT训练联合绳带疗法均30min/次,3次/周(每隔48h训练1次)。三组干预周期均为6周,并分别在康复干预前、干预后第2、4、6周(即T0、T2、T4、T6)时对患者进行FMA-LE、足偏角、BBS、MBI评定。 结果:干预6周后,联合组和mCIMT组患者的FMA-LE、BBS、MBI评分均较治疗前显著提高(P<0.05,P<0.01)。干预6周后,联合组和mCIMT组的FMA-LE、BBS、MBI评分提高显著优于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。干预6周后,联合组FMA-LE、MBI评分显著高于mCIMT组(P<0.05),但BBS评分比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。足偏角组间主效应和时间主效应不存在交互作用,仅时间主效应存在统计学意义(F时间=12.914,P<0.01;F分组=0.718,P>0.05;F交互=2.097,P>0.05)。 结论:在常规康复治疗的基础上,mCIMT训练、绳带疗法联合mCIMT训练均可有效改善脑卒中患者的下肢运动功能、平衡能力及日常生活活动能力,但对足偏角的改善较弱。而绳带疗法联合mCIMT训练相较仅mCIMT训练在加速脑卒中患者平衡能力的康复进程方面更有优势,且在下肢运动功能以及日常生活活动能力方面,联合治疗效果更显著;但在干预6周后,两者在平衡能力改善方面效果相当。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To investigate the effects of rope belt therapy combined with mCIMT on lower limb motor function, balance and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Methods: Forty-five stroke patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Dalian Seaport Hospital were selected and randomly divided into the control group (n=15 ), the mCIMT group (n=15 ), and the combined group (n=15). The control group only carried out conventional rehabilitation training; on the basis of conventional rehabilitation training, the mCIMT group carried out mCIMT training, and the combined group carried out both rope belt therapy and mCIMT training . All three groups had routine rehabilitation training 60 min/times, 5 times/week; mCIMT training , mCIMT training combined with rope belt therapy intervent on were 30 min/times, 3 times/week (training every 48 h).The intervention period was 6 weeks in all three groups, and the patients were assessed for FMA-LE , foot deviation angle , BBS , MBI before the rehabilitation intervention, and at the second, fourth, and sixth weeks (i.e., T0, T2, T4, and T6) after the intervention, respectively. Results: After 6 weeks of intervention, the FMA-LE, BBS, and MBI scores of patients in both the combined and mCIMT groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (all P<0.01).After 6 weeks of intervention, the FMA-LE, BBS, and MBI scores improved significantly better in the combined and mCIMT groups than in the control group ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01).After 6 weeks of intervention, FMA-LE and MBI score were significantly higher in the combined group than mCIMT group ( P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in BBS scores ( P>0.05). There was no interaction between the main effect of foot deviation angle between groups and the main effect of time, and only the main effect of time was statistically significant (F time = 12.914, P < 0.01; F grouping = 0.718, P > 0.05; F interaction = 2.097, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Based on routine rehabilitation therapy, both mCIMT training and rope belt therapy combined with mCIMT training can effectively improve the lower limb function, balance ability, and activities of daily living (ADL) of stroke patients, but the improvement in foot inversion angle is limited. Rope belt therapy combined mCIMT training has an advantage over mCIMT training in accelerating the recovery of balance ability in stroke patients, and the combined treatment was significantly better than mCIMT training alone in lower limb motor function and ADL; However, after 6 weeks of intervention, the two methods show similar effects on balance ability improvement.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭