文章摘要
血管性痴呆患者认知功能损伤的神经电生理特征及临床意义
Neuroelectrophysiological characteristics and clinical significance of cognitive impairment in patients with vascular dementia
投稿时间:2024-07-26  修订日期:2024-07-26
DOI:
中文关键词: 血管性痴呆  认知  事件相关电位  潜伏期  波幅
英文关键词: Vascular dementia  Cognition  Event-related potential  Latency  amplitude
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
邢秋泓 西南交通大学附属医院&
amp
成都市第三人民医院 
610031
摘要点击次数: 8
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的 探讨血管性痴呆患者认知功能损伤的神经电生理特征及临床意义。方法 选择2022-2024在我院神经内科住院的VaD患者100例作为观察组,同步选择在我院神经内科门诊因其他原因需行头颅核磁检查的认知功能正常患者99例作为对照组。比较两组一般临床资料,头颅核磁检查结果、认知和心理功能评估和听觉事件相关波群P1、N1、P2、N2、P3在FZ、CZ、PZ导联的变化情况。结果 观察组饮酒史、高脂血症和高同型半胱氨酸血症等一般临床指标显著高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的白质疏松、陈旧性脑梗死、脑微出血等脑血管损伤的发生率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组记忆力减退、注意力减退和执行力减退的发生率显著高于对照组,SAS和SDS评分亦显著升高(P<0.05);观察组听觉ERP波群P1、N2、P3在FZ、CZ、PZ导联的潜伏期显著高于对照组(P<0.05),两组间听觉ERP波群N1、P2在FZ、CZ、PZ导联的潜伏期无显著差别(P>0.05);观察组听觉ERP波群P3在FZ、CZ、PZ导联的波幅显著降低,听觉ERP波群N2在PZ导联的波幅显著降低(P<0.05),两组间听觉ERP波群P1、N1、P2在在FZ、CZ、PZ导联的波幅无显著差别(P>0.05),听觉ERP波群N2在FZ、CZ导联的波幅有降低趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 血管性痴呆患者听觉ERP波群N1、P2无明显神经电生理改变,P1可能表现为潜伏期延长,听觉ERP波群N2、P3可随认知功能减退潜伏期延长、波幅降低。
英文摘要:
      Abstract Objective To investigate the electrophysiological characteristics and clinical significance of cognitive impairment in patients with vascular dementia. Methods A total of 100 patients with VaD who were hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of our hospital from 2022-2024 were selected as the observation group, and 99 patients with normal cognitive function who needed brain MRI examination for other reasons were selected as the control group. The general clinical data, head magnetic resonance imaging results, cognitive and psychological function assessment and auditory event-related wave group P1, N1, P2, N2, P3 in FZ, CZ, PZ leads were compared between the two groups. Results The general clinical indicators such as drinking history, hyperlipidemia and hyperhomocysteinemia in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of leukoaraiosis, old cerebral infarction, cerebral microbleeds and other cerebrovascular injuries in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Observation group decreased memory, attention and executive force is significantly higher than the control group, the incidence of SAS and SDS score also significantly increased (P < 0.05); The latencies of auditory ERP wave groups P1, N2 and P3 in FZ, CZ and PZ in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the latencies of auditory ERP wave groups N1 and P2 in FZ, CZ and PZ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the amplitude of auditory ERP wave group P3 in FZ, CZ and PZ leads was significantly reduced, and the amplitude of auditory ERP wave group N2 in PZ leads was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the amplitude of auditory ERP wave group P1, N1 and P2 in FZ, CZ and PZ leads between the two groups (P > 0.05). The amplitude of auditory ERP group N2 in FZ and CZ leads tended to decrease, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions There are no obvious neurophysiological changes in auditory ERP wave group N1 and P2 in patients with vascular dementia, but the latency of auditory ERP wave group P1 may be prolonged. The latency of auditory ERP wave group N2 and P3 may be prolonged and the amplitude may be decreased with cognitive decline.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭