| 孙莉，王舒，沈晓艳.不同强度经颅直流电刺激治疗真性球麻痹吞咽障碍的疗效观察[J].神经损伤功能重建,2022,17(10):587-590 |
| 不同强度经颅直流电刺激治疗真性球麻痹吞咽障碍的疗效观察 |
| Clinical Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Different Intensities on Dyspha⁃gia after True Bulbar Paralysis |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 经颅直流电刺激 真性球麻痹 吞咽障碍 |
| 英文关键词: transcranial direct current stimulation bulbar paralysis dysphagia |
| 基金项目:武汉市卫生健康
科研基金（No. W
X19D58）；
武汉市卫生计生
科研基金（No. W
X18Y01） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2369 |
| 全文下载次数: 3271 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨不同强度经颅直流电刺激（tDCS）治疗真性球麻痹吞咽障碍的临床疗效。方法：选取符合
入选标准的真性球麻痹患者42例，随机分为假刺激组、低强度组、高强度组，每组14例。3组患者均给予常
规吞咽康复训练，假刺激组予以假性tDCS刺激，低强度组予以1 mA tDCS电刺激，高强度组予以2 mA tDCS
电刺激；均为20 min/次，5 次/周，共治疗3周。分别于治疗前和治疗3周后，采用纤维内镜下吞咽困难严重程
度量表（FEDSS）、改良曼恩吞咽能力评估量表（MMASA）评分和表面肌电（sEMG）数据进行评定和分析。结
果：治疗后，低强度组和高强度组的FEDSS评分低于假刺激组（均P＜0.05），且高强度组低于低强度组（均
P＜0.05）；低强度组和高强度组的MMASA评分和sEMG平均肌电值均高于假刺激组（均P＜0.05），且高强
度组高于低强度组（P＜0.05）。结论：低强度、高强度tDCS电刺激均可改善真性球麻痹吞咽障碍，且高强度
刺激疗效可能优于低强度刺激。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To explore the therapeutic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different intensities in the treatment of swallowing disorder of patients with true bulbar paralysis. Methods: Forty-two patients with true bulbar palsy were enrolled and randomly divided into control group, low intensity
group, and high intensity group, with 14 cases in each group. All cases were given routine swallowing rehabilitation training. Cases in high-intensity group were given 2 mA stimulation, cases in low-intensity group were given
1 mA stimulation, and those in control group were given sham stimulation, 20 min per time, 5 times per week and
for 3 weeks. Before and after 3-week of treatment, the severity scale of dysphagia under fiberoptic endoscope
(FEDSS), modified Mann swallowing ability assessment scale (MMASA) and surface electromyography (sEMG)
data of three groups were got and analyzed. Results: After treatment, the FEDSS score of low and high intensity
groups were lower than that of control group (P<0.05) and the FEDSS score of high intensity group was lower
than that of low intensity group (P<0.05). After treatment, the MMASA score and sEMG of low and high intensity groups were higher than that of control group (P<0.05) and the MMASA score and sEMG of high intensity
group was higher than that of low intensity group (P<0.05). Conclusion: tDCS electrical stimulation can improve swallowing disorder of patients with true bulbar paralysis, and the therapeutic effect of high-intensity is
probably better than low-intensity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |