| 张莉
，董丽平
，童萍
，张淑芳
，高霞
，孙亭
，石元洪.药物诱导催眠技术在急诊分离障碍中的应用[J].神经损伤功能重建,2020,15(2):87-90 |
| 药物诱导催眠技术在急诊分离障碍中的应用 |
| Drug-Induced Hypnosis in Clinical Emergency Care of Dissociation Disorder Patients |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 催眠 药物诱导 急诊 分离障碍 |
| 英文关键词: hypnosis drug-induced clinical emergency care dissociation disorder |
| 基金项目:扬州市“十三五”科
技强卫工程”领军
人才（创新团队）基 金（No．LJRC20184） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2673 |
| 全文下载次数: 2892 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：前瞻性探索药物诱导催眠技术在急诊治疗分离障碍（DD）中的作用。方法：根据患者的治疗意
愿将患者分为3组，即A组（不干预）、B组（服用抗精神病药物）和C组（药物诱导下催眠）。评定临床效果、
分离体验量表（DES）评分和不良反应，随访观察3月。结果：共83例患者完成试验。临床疗效评分和DES
评分有相似结果。针对不同的时间点，与A组相比，在第2周仅C组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；而在其他
时间点，B、C 2组均差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。各组别内部，与12周比较，B组在第2、4周差异有统计学
意义（P＜0.05）。C组不良反应比率低于B组（P＜0.05）。结论：药物治疗见效较慢，但疗效渐增，不良反应
较多；催眠治疗则相反。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To evaluate the effectiveness of drug-induced hypnosis for clinical emergency care in
patients with dissociation disorder (DD). Methods: According to the willingness of patients to accept type of
treatment, patients were divided into 3 groups, including group A (no intervention), group B (medicine), and
group C (drug-induced hypnosis). The therapeutic effect (TE), Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), and adverse
reactions were evaluated, and patients were followed up for 3 months. Results: A total of 83 patients completed
the study. TE and DES yielded similar results. For different time points, compared with group A, the differences
were significant only for group C at the 2nd week of treatment (P<0.05); at other time points, group B and group
C both showed significant difference (P<0.05). Within each group, compared with the 12th week, group B showed
significant difference at the 2nd and 4th week (P<0.05). The rates of adverse reactions in group C were lower than
those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of DD treatment by medicine increases relatively slow, and
there are more adverse reactions. Hypnosis therapy is just the opposite. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|