| 黄海珊
，汪晖
，李玲
，王冰花.脑卒中患者适时需求调查表的编制及信效度研究[J].神经损伤功能重建,2019,14(1):6-10 |
| 脑卒中患者适时需求调查表的编制及信效度研究 |
| Study on Reliability and Validity of Timing-It-Right Questionnaire for Patients with Stroke |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 脑卒中 患者 适时需求 自评量表 |
| 英文关键词: stroke patients timing it right needs self-report scale |
| 基金项目:华中科技大学院系
自主创新研究基金
（No.2016YXMS16
1） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2877 |
| 全文下载次数: 3190 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：以适时模式为框架，在分析患者需求的变化基础上，编制适时需求调查表。方法：依据相关文
献、质性访谈结果、适时模式框架形成条目池。通过两轮专家内容效度评定，并邀请10例脑卒中患者阅读
量表，增加和修订条目形成量表初始版本。通过随机抽样法调查新收入院患者200例，进行临床施测回收
有效问卷183份，经项目分析和信效度检验形成量表的临床版本。结果：经质性访谈和文献查询，结合适时
模式框架，形成73个备选条目池。经预实验及两轮专家内容效度评定，形成 36个条目的初始版本。经条目
筛选、探索性因子分析，未减少条目。信度分析结果显示：量表总体的 Cronbach’s α系数为 0.795，各维度数
值均在0.7以上；折半信度采用 Guttman Spilt-Half系数，量表总折半信度为 0.782，各维度数值均在0.7以上；
信效度达到心理测量学标准，形成临床应用版本。结论：编制的脑卒中患者适时需求调查表信效度良好。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Within a timing-it-right framework and based on the analysis of the changes in patient
needs, a timeliness requirement questionnaire was compiled. Methods: The article pool was formed according
to the relevant literature, qualitative interview results, and timeliness framework. Through two rounds of expert
content validity evaluation and the invitation of 10 stroke patients to read over the scale, the articles were
expanded and revised to form the initial version of the rating scale. A total of 200 new hospital patients were
investigated by random sampling, and 183 effective questionnaires were used for clinical survey and recovery.
Through project analysis and reliability and validity tests, the clinical version of the scale was formed. Results:
Through qualitative interviews and literature enquiries, combined with the timeliness framework, 73 alternative
pools were formed. The initial version of 36 articles was formed by pretests and two rounds of expert content
validity evaluation. Item selection and exploratory factor analysis did not reduce the number of articles. The
results of reliability analysis showed that the total Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.795, and the value of each
dimension was above 0.7. The half reliability was evaluated by Guttman Split-Half coefficient; the total half
reliability of the scale was 0.782, and the value of each dimension was above 0.7. The reliability and validity met
the psychometric standards, and the clinical application version of the rating scale was established. Conclusion:
The stroke patient timeliness requirement questionnaire has good reliability and validity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |